Whatever Happened to Liberalism?
Enough
navel gazing! But not enough cultural analysis! A book making the
review rounds (and sitting on my desk waiting for me to crack it open)
is Patrick Deneen’s
Why Liberalism Failed.
As one review puts it, the Notre Dame political theorist “offers a
stinging indictment” of troubling assumptions imbibed by both the left
and right, assumptions that are now undermining our culture and
politics. The problems are two.
The
first is that the political and cultural wars between left and right
obscure the fact that progressives and conservatives alike accept the
liberal understanding of human freedom as “expressive individualism.”
They treat each other as mortal enemies, and yet they are both engaged
in advancing an “anti-culture” that tells young men and women that
liberation is their only birthright. …
[Second]
The victors in modern liberal society—the “new aristocracy,” as Deneen
calls them—are the ones reaping the greatest personal benefits from
liberalism while leaving the worst cultural wreckage to those whose
economic, moral, and metaphysical lives are far more fragile.
Read the review in
The Weekly Standard for more details. If you want to get a flavor of Deneen and his concerns, check out his essay in
First Things “The Ignoble Lie: How the New Aristocracy Masks Its Privilege.”
I do think he’s on to something in identifying our cultural elite as a
new aristocracy of sorts, with all the attendant problems of
aristocracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment