[Editor’s Note: On June 16, Pope Leo XIV commented on the divisions between the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) and the Catholic Church, noting of the SSPX that “they refuse to accept certain fundamental elements of the Church, starting with various points of the Second Vatican Council.” Many SSPX sympathizers have resurrected favorite talking points about Vatican II — arguing that the teachings of the Council are not binding on the faithful due to its lack of solemn definitions and anathemas, its classification as a “pastoral council,” and the fact that none of the Council’s teachings were declared infallible. These arguments, however, ignore the clear teaching of popes and bishops on the magisterial weight of many of the Council’s teachings.
Perhaps the weight of the Council’s teachings were never taught more clearly than in Pope St. Paul VI in his general audience address of January 12, 1966. Unfortunately the Vatican website has only published this speech in Italian. What follows is an English translation of that address, originally published in volume 11, issue 2 of The Pope Speaks. It is being re-published here as a service to English-speaking Catholics.
The key teaching appears in the seventh paragraph: “Some people have asked what authority, what theological qualification the Council intended to attribute to its teaching, since it clearly avoided issuing solemn dogmatic definitions that would involve the infallibility of the magisterium. The answer is clear for anyone who recalls the Council declaration issued on March 6, 1964, and repeated on November 16, 1964.[4] In view of the pastoral nature of the Council, it avoided any extraordinary statement of dogmas that would be endowed with the note of infallibility, but it still provided its teaching with the authority of the supreme ordinary magisterium. This ordinary magisterium, which is so obviously official, has to be accepted with docility and sincerity by all the faithful, in accordance with the mind of the Council on the nature and aims of the individual documents.”—ML]


